Maintaining Scientific Inquiry In Online Education

Authors

  • Nathan R. Dolenc University of Louisiana at Lafayette https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4473-4570
  • Patricia Beaulieu University of Louisiana at Lafayette
  • Peter Sheppard University of Louisiana at Lafayette

Keywords:

science inquiry, inquiry based learning, online education

Abstract

Teachers were given the challenging task of transferring their formal science classroom lessons to an online format at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. How were teachers able to recreate student-centered science lessons online? What challenges did teachers face in teaching science online? This study examined how a group of teachers, working to create a summer online science camp, were able to maintain a science inquiry based learning environment in an online format. Teachers revealed positive attitudes toward producing a scientific inquiry based learning environment online, new opportunities for creativity in teaching science, and different perspectives on how teachers interact with students.

Author Biographies

  • Nathan R. Dolenc, University of Louisiana at Lafayette

    Dr. Dolenc is an Assistant Professor of Science Education in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette.

  • Patricia Beaulieu, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
    Dr. Beaulieu is an assistant professor of mathematics with research interests in number theory and mathematics teacher preparation.
  • Peter Sheppard, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
    Dr. Sheppard is a professor of mathematics education. He holds the SLEMCO/BORSF Professorship in Education. He also serves as Executive Director of the Center for Excellence in Education at UL Lafayette.

References

Avsec, S., & Kocijancic, S. (2014). Effectiveness of inquiry-based learning: How do middle school students learn to maximize the effi cacy of a water turbine. International journal of engineering education, 30(6), 1436-1449.

De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of educational research, 68(2), 179-201.

Granger, E. M., Bevis, T. H., Saka, Y., Southerland, S. A., Sampson, V., & Tate, R. L. (2012). The efficacy of student-centered instruction in supporting science learning. Science, 338(6103), 105-108.

Keselman, A. (2003). Supporting inquiry learning by promoting normative understanding of multivariable causality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 898-921.

Milne, C., & Otieno, T. (2007). Understanding engagement: Science demonstrations and emotional energy. Science Education, 91(4), 523-553.

Novak, A. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Using technology to support inquiry in middle school science. In Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 75-101). Springer, Dordrecht.

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z.C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational research review, 14, 47-61.

Polkinghorne, D.E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of counseling psychology, 52(2), 137.

Stake, R.E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.

Tinto, V. (2003). Learning better together: The impact of learning communities on student success. Higher Education monograph series, 1(8), 1-8.

Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education next, 12(1), 82-83.

Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 321-341.

Yin, R.K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, Inc.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-17