Maintaining Scientific Inquiry In Online Education
Keywords:
science inquiry, inquiry based learning, online educationAbstract
Teachers were given the challenging task of transferring their formal science classroom lessons to an online format at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. How were teachers able to recreate student-centered science lessons online? What challenges did teachers face in teaching science online? This study examined how a group of teachers, working to create a summer online science camp, were able to maintain a science inquiry based learning environment in an online format. Teachers revealed positive attitudes toward producing a scientific inquiry based learning environment online, new opportunities for creativity in teaching science, and different perspectives on how teachers interact with students.
References
Avsec, S., & Kocijancic, S. (2014). Effectiveness of inquiry-based learning: How do middle school students learn to maximize the effi cacy of a water turbine. International journal of engineering education, 30(6), 1436-1449.
De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of educational research, 68(2), 179-201.
Granger, E. M., Bevis, T. H., Saka, Y., Southerland, S. A., Sampson, V., & Tate, R. L. (2012). The efficacy of student-centered instruction in supporting science learning. Science, 338(6103), 105-108.
Keselman, A. (2003). Supporting inquiry learning by promoting normative understanding of multivariable causality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 898-921.
Milne, C., & Otieno, T. (2007). Understanding engagement: Science demonstrations and emotional energy. Science Education, 91(4), 523-553.
Novak, A. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Using technology to support inquiry in middle school science. In Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 75-101). Springer, Dordrecht.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z.C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational research review, 14, 47-61.
Polkinghorne, D.E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of counseling psychology, 52(2), 137.
Stake, R.E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
Tinto, V. (2003). Learning better together: The impact of learning communities on student success. Higher Education monograph series, 1(8), 1-8.
Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education next, 12(1), 82-83.
Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 321-341.
Yin, R.K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, Inc.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Research Issues in Contemporary Education (RICE) is a nationally indexed, double-blind, peer-reviewed online journal that publishes educational research studies, literature reviews, theoretical manuscripts, and practitioner-oriented articles regarding issues in education. Views expressed in all published articles are the views of the author(s), and publication in RICE does not constitute endorsement. Submission of an article implies that it has not been published and is not currently under review for publication elsewhere.
RICE is an online journal available in the public domain, and use of its content is protected by a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. This license provides authors with an assurance that LERA values their rights to their scholarly works and has adopted this license to restrict use of RICE content without appropriate permission and attribution.